Okay, tags are better than categories or folders because they are much more flexible. But still; I don’t like them.
Take for instance my notebook application Evernote. I told you about Evernote in a previous posting. It is the absolute perfect notebook, synchronising my notes between my netbook, the Internet and my smartphone. I keep my personal and work related diary with Evernote and I put there every little piece of information I come across.
In Evernote, you create so called “notebooks”, like major categories in which you put your notes. And then you can tag every note with as many tags as you want. For me, this is pretty useless because I rather use the powerful search engine included in Evernote. It searches all your notes, recognises even words in pictures, embedded PDFs or handwritten notes. If I want to look up a particular note, I remember a few words that belong to the text - I type them into the search engine and off we go. Powerful search engines are a real handy thing, not tags.
I don’t like tags because you have to consciously think of labels to tag your stuff with - and in most cases that’s forced and pointless anyway. At the OU we have to collect our pieces of work in ePortfolios. Now, I’ve never worked with ePortfolios before … and I already love them! I love the reflective style of working - but there’ll be a text of it’s own about portfolio work. Anyway, one of the necessities is that we have to tag our files with as many tags as we want, but also some of eight default categories: skills, reflection, critique, proactivity, practice-related, communication-related, technology-related, research-related. What’s the point? I will never look for my files with the help of these tags. I might remember an approximate point in time when I wrote the files, so I might look for them chronologically. Or I run a search on the title - or even better, if that’s supported by the software, a full text search.
I don’t like tags, I like search engines. Full stop. :)